EFMD Accredited PROCESS
The EFMD programme accreditation process for initial accreditation will typically require 2-3 years. The re-accreditation process is shorter.
Non-binding preliminary advice is offered to the management of your institution and programme about the likelihood of being declared eligible for EFMD programme accreditation. A draft datasheet is a preferred way of providing structured information about your programme(s).
Pre-eligibility with advisory service
The EFMD Accredited office, upon evaluation and discussion with the institution, assigns an advisor who supports the institution during the stage leading up to the formal application for eligibility. The advisory service is compulsory for all initial applications.
Application for Eligibility
The institution applies for eligibility by submitting the final datasheet to the EFMD Accredited office at the latest one month in advance of the targeted Committee meeting. The advisor submits at the same time an eligibility evaluation of the applicant programme(s).
with advisory service, in the case of initial applicants
After an institution is declared eligible to enter the EFMD programme accreditation process, it should carry out an extensive self-evaluation. The self-assessment report should cover the five chapters of the Standards and Criteria document. In the case of initial applications, an advisor will help the institution to address any eligibility reservations and to prepare the self-assessment report prior to the peer review visit. At the end of this phase, the advisor submits an assessment evaluation.
Peer review visit
An international team of four peer reviewers, including one corporate representative, will then visit the institution to assess the programme(s) in terms of the EFMD programme accreditation standards and to draw up recommendations for future progress.
The peer review report sets out the team’s final assessment of the programme(s) against the EFMD Programme Accreditation Board quality criteria, together with its recommendation to the Accreditation Board regarding accreditation.
With the formal agreement of the institution, the peer review report is submitted to the Accreditation Board for a decision on accreditation. The outcome will be 5-year accreditation, 3-year accreditation or no accreditation.
Continuous improvement following accreditation
All institutions within the EFMD programme accreditation system are required to actively pursue a development plan for the accredited programme(s), agreed with the EFMD Accredited Office in the case of a 5-year accreditation or determined by the Accreditation Board in the case of a 3-year accreditation.